🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are watching intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a rising group of nations are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our children's childhood". The policy is expected to be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an similar ban could be "an options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked parliament to pass a law increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a related step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised families to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is granted. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"An effective age limit is a good first step," said one European lawmaker driving the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the government has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "based on strong research".

Previously, support built behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. However, the administration pledged to further research the topic.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. An organization established by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after viewing disturbing platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are secure and age appropriate for young users," commented a influential peer.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, legislation is largely happening at the regional government level against a backdrop of country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further time dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures mandating parental consent for teenagers to open social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from various individuals to mimic the Australian path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, further states are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global bodies adopt a more cautious position. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

As this international discussion continues, the steps of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that states globally are increasingly prepared to delay for the industry to self-regulate.